Tunica County NAACP

Your Town Your NAACP Working Together For A Better Community

Home
About Us
All For One One For All
Black History Facts
Blues Belt Marketplace
Community Events
Contact Us
FAQ
MS. State Legislature
In My Lifetime
Membership Application
Monthly Meetings
Ms. Stimulus Package
NAACP 100th Anniversary
NAACP Executive Board
NAACP Executive Committee
NAACP History
NAACP Members
NAACP Mission
NAACP News
NAACP Programs
President Obama
Scholarship Information
Privacy Policy
The Goose Golden Egg
The Good Bad and Ugly
Tunica County
Tunica County Schools
Volunteering
Youth & College

NAACP Files Landmark Lawsuit Today Against Wells Fargo and HSBC

Remedies would benefit millions of potential borrowers

Today, the NAACP filed separate lawsuits in U.S. District Court in California against two of the country’s largest lenders, Wells Fargo, and HSBC. These lawsuits allege systematic, institutionalized racism in sub-prime home mortgage lending. The remedies being asked for in the lawsuit include measures for increased accountability and transparency.

 

 

According to the lawsuits, African American homeowners who received sub-prime mortgage loans from these lenders were more than 30 percent more likely to be issued a higher rate loan than Caucasian borrowers with the same qualifications.  Other studies cited in the lawsuits demonstrate that disparities are pervasive. In fact, upper income African Americans are more than twice as likely to receive higher cost loans as their lower income white counterparts. The National Community Reinvestment Coalition’s most recent study finds that discrimination against minorities persists in mortgage lending. The Federal Reserve Board, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the FDIC have all made similar observations.  

 

“It is time for these lenders to be held accountable,” said NAACP President Benjamin Todd Jealous,   “We look forward to forcing real change and real relief through this lawsuit.”

 

“These banks are getting billions in bailout money yet think that they can get away with business as usual,” said Austin Tighe, co-lead counsel for the NAACP.  “Predatory lending policies and practices are legally actionable, morally reprehensible, and fiscally irresponsible.”

 

These two new lawsuits raise the same claims as pending litigation by the NAACP against other mortgage industry leaders.  Lenders named in this pending litigation include Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., Ameriquest Mortgage Co., Bear Sterns Residential Mortgage Corp. d/b/a Encore Credit, Chase Bank USA, Citimortgage, First Franklin Financial Corp., First Tennessee Bank d/b/a First Horizon National Corp., Fremont Investment & Loan, GMAC Mortgage Group, LLC, GMAC ResCap, Long Beach Mortgage and SunTrust Mortgage.

 

“Lenders named in the suits, on average, made high cost sub-prime loans to higher qualified African Americans 54 percent of the time, compared to 23 percent of the time for Caucasians,” said NAACP Interim General Counsel Angela Ciccolo.  “Our lawsuit aims to change the policies and practices which lead to those results.”

Earlier this year a federal court denied a joint motion filed by those defendants seeking to dismiss the lawsuit.  The court denied that motion, finding that the NAACP had standing to bring the lawsuit, and that it had adequately stated its claims for the lawsuit to proceed.  The lenders will now be required to turn over information and documents regarding their mortgage policies and practices.

 

One lender has already entered into a preliminary settlement agreement with the NAACP, and a number of other lenders are engaged in similar discussions.  Those settlement discussions are being mediated by the Honorable John K. Trotter, a former Justice on the California Court of Appeals.

 

Representing the NAACP is its Interim General Counsel Angela Ciccolo in Baltimore, Maryland; Brian Kabateck and Richard Kellner of Kabateck Brown Kellner in Los Angeles, California; Austin Tighe of Feazell & Tighe, L.L.P. Gary Bledsoe of Law Offices of Gary Bledsoe & Associates, both in Austin, Texas and Daniel Covich of Webb, Cason and Covich in Corpus Christi, Texas.

 

Founded in 1909, the NAACP--the nation's oldest, largest and most widely-recognized grassroots–based civil rights organization—is celebrating its 100th anniversary this year. Its more than half-million members and supporters throughout the United States and the world are the premier advocates for civil rights in their communities, conducting voter mobilization and monitoring equal opportunity in the public and private sectors.

 

Missisippi Housing Advocates File Federal Lawsuit Against HUD

The Mississippi State Conference NAACP, Gulf Coast Fair Housing Center and several individual residents today filed a lawsuit in federal court in Washington, D.C. against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) challenging its approval of a plan submitted by Mississippi to divert  $600 million of federal hurricane recovery funds from housing programs designed to address the affordable housing crisis in Mississippi caused by Hurricane Katrina to finance the expansion of the Port of Gulfport.

 

For the full complaint, click  HUD Complaint as Filed.pdf.

 

Following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, Congress appropriated $5.481 billion of the emergency recovery funds to Mississippi. HUD’s own description of this appropriation law notes that its primary purpose is to address the critical housing needs in the hurricane damaged area, especially affordable housing needs. Administration of this funding was to be overseen by HUD under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, which includes requirements that use of these funds conform to the Fair Housing Act and be used primarily to benefit low- and moderate-income people. The suit contends that HUD’s approval of a plan which siphons funds from housing programs to a plan for a major expansion of the port is contrary to the primary purpose of the Congressional appropriation and violates the requirements of the CDBG program.    


Included in the complaint are claims that HUD has also approved several waivers of the requirement, for programs totaling $4 billion, that 50 percent of the funds benefit low- and moderate-income people, leaving only half of the remaining $1.4 billion targeted for those persons. As a result, HUD has authorized Mississippi to drop its commitment to lower-income households affected by Katrina from 50 percent to 13 percent. In Harrison, Hancock and Jackson counties, approximately 65 percent of the housing units exposed to the storm surge and more than 57 percent of the units exposed to flooding were occupied by households with incomes below the U.S. median household income level.

 

African Americans in southern Mississippi are disproportionately more likely than whites to be living in poverty or in lower-income households, and are more likely than whites to be renters instead of homeowners.

 

“Though the storm did not intentionally discriminate, the damage did reveal the impact of decades-long discrimination against poor, African American people who were already living in substandard housing,” said Derrick Johnson, State President of Mississippi NAACP. “For the first time in our state’s history, we have the resources to right this wrong. It is a matter of priorities. Now is not the time to pull the carpet back over the ugly stain of segregation.”

“Safe, affordable housing was touted as the hallmark of Mississippi’s recovery efforts. Our choice to either fulfill that commitment or to deny options for basic shelter to thousands of low-income, elderly and disabled families will impact the vitality of coastal communities for generations to come,” said Charmel Gaulden, executive director, Gulf Coast Fair Housing Center. “Katrina decimated the availability of affordable housing, especially rentals, in this area. Now, our own government is seeking to leave the least among us out in the cold. We must hold HUD accountable for a fair, equitable rebuilding effort.”

The suit seeks a declaration by the court that, prior to approving the proposal, HUD was required to review and assess the State of Mississippi’s port expansion plan to determine, at a minimum, whether the proposal complied with Fair Housing Act and low-to-moderate income benefit requirements and that HUD violated these duties by accepting the port expansion plan without conducting such a review.  It seeks an order from the court prohibiting HUD from releasing or approving the obligation of any of the nearly $600 million in CDBG funds.

 

“Through this lawsuit, we intend to enforce HUD’s duty to ensure there will be housing choice for the thousands of households that Mississippi does not want to help,” said Reilly Morse, Mississippi Center for Justice senior attorney.  “The diversion of funds intended to rebuild safe, affordable housing for low-income, elderly and disabled people has shattered the promise of making affordable housing the priority of this recovery effort.”


“It is regrettable that HUD has approved a plan that so badly turns its back on the housing needs of the most vulnerable residents in the Gulf Coast area,” said Barbara Arnwine, executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. “This lawsuit is designed to correct this wrongheaded decision and ensure more federal assistance is directed to replacing and growing a diverse affordable housing stock in the areas devastated by Katrina.”

Attorneys from Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC are working in conjunction with the Mississippi Center for Justice and the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law to represent the plaintiffs pro bono.